"We Don't Torture Anyone, OK?"

By Corinne Lesnes, Le Monde, via www.truthout.org

Out of 505 pages, George Tenet devotes only three to what will remain at the center of his record: the detention of al-Qaeda suspects in secret prisons and the use of so-called "enhanced" interrogation techniques. He refuses to use the word torture, all the while acknowledging that the program put into place has brought the United States "onto new moral and legal ground."

In the promotional interviews for his book, he was, however, questioned at length on this subject, notably by Scott Pelley on CBS's "60 Minutes" program. "The image that's been used to portray us was that we were sitting around a campfire and said to ourselves: 'Oh boy, now we get to go torture some people.' But the fact of the matter is that we don't torture anyone. Let me repeat that for you: we don't torture anyone, OK?" "Come on, George!" says Scott Pelley incredulously. "We don't torture anyone," repeats Mr. Tenet.

The journalist throws out the name of presumed master craftsman of the 9/11 attacks, Khaled Sheikh Mohammed, transferred to Guantanamo in September 2006 after having been held for four years in a secret place. "We don't torture anyone," repeats Mr. Tenet. "Water-boarding?" (a technique that consists of making the prisoner believe he is drowning) the journalist insists. According to the press, the Pakistani is one of those who have undergone this simulacrum of drowning. "We don't ..." Mr. Tenet begins. "I don't talk about techniques," he finishes. "It's torture," the journalist remarks.

"Now, listen!" Mr. Tenet exclaims, getting irritated. "The context is post-September 11. I'm getting reports that talk about nuclear weapons in New York City, apartment buildings that are going to be blown up, planes that are going to fly into airports.... Plot lines I don't know about.... And I'm struggling to find out where the next disaster is going to happen. Everybody forgets the ... context: the palpable fear we felt on the basis of the fact that there was so much we didn't know. I know that this program has saved lives. I know that it has upset plans." "What you are saying is that there are people it's necessary to torture," concludes the journalist. "No, I didn't say that; I didn't say that," disclaims Mr. Tenet.

According to Human Rights Watch, one hundred "high value detainees" have gone through secret prisons. Last week, the authorities acknowledged that the program was still active. The Pentagon announced that an Iraqi accused of being an al-Qaeda official in Afghanistan, Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, had been transferred to Guantanamo after being held by the CIA in a secret location.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Translation: t r u t h o u t French language correspondent Leslie Thatcher.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bush-Cheney and torture

The book *Impeach the President: The Case Against Bush and Cheney*, edited by Dennis Loo and Peter Phillips, is a compilation of essays by notable impeachment advocates including Greg Palast and Mark Crispin Miller.

In Chapter 9, "The Campaign for Unfettered Power," researcher and educator Barbara J. Bowley writes that Bush has issued an unprecedented number of "signing statements" as a way of setting himself above the law. In 2005, Bush attached a signing statement to the McCain amendment, a bill which would have prohibited torture of detainees.

The signing statement said Bush would interpret the anti-torture amendment "in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the president to supervise the unitary executive branch...and consistent with the constitutional limitations on judicial power." Or, as Bowley says, Bush was claiming "that neither the courts nor Congress had the constitutional authority to interfere with his prerogative to act on his own terms."

In Chapter 5, "Defending the Indefensible: Torture and the American Empire," Dennis Loo notes that while the U.S. has used torture in the past, (for example, in the slave trade) Bush and Cheney have taken steps toward making torture a more extensive, officially sanctioned practice.

The practice of "rendition," according to Loo, is "transporting prisoners to 'black sites' in places such as Uzbekistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Romania and Poland for further 'interrogation.'"

Loo adds, "The Washington Post broke the story about rendition in 2005. After this revelation [Condoleeza] Rice faced a firestorm of criticism about this practice from Europeans during her tour there. According to a U.S. State Department February 2001 report, Uzbek police routinely are guilty of 'beating, often with blunt weapons, and asphyxiation with a gas mask.'"

According to Loo, "Human rights groups reported that Uzbek jail torture included boiling of body parts, electroshock to genitals and the use of pliers to pry off fingernails and toenails. Two prisoners were boiled to death, these groups reported. Despite the State Department's own report on torture, Rice and the Bush administration have nonetheless been flying prisoners -- some of whom are 'ghost' prisoners because their identity has been altogether hidden -- to places like Uzbekistan."

Loo says, "According to an April 4, 2006, Amnesty International investigation, the CIA has flown some thousand flights of this kind, with the number of rendition prisoners unknown...Rice's statements for the record on this practice were striking for their carefully worded character, as if she were trying to remain technically accurate and speaking for the sake of those who were looking only at the surface meaning, while leaving the door wide open to continue the torture that the European government leaders, military and intelligence officers *know full well* the U.S. is engaged in."

The above-mentioned book covers additional Bush-Cheney offenses. However, the administration's action regarding torture is one of the most compelling arguments for impeachment.

Torture and America's moral standing in the world

I find it rather annoying to have to listen to people who expouse morality without looking at their own. Yes, torture is cruel and oftentimes useless. However, to stand there and point and say that's immoral is ridiculous if you don't include 12 years of sanctions and isolation imposed upon Iraq, that quite frankly nobody seemed to notice until George Bush said anything. Secondly, who's approval are you looking for when it comes to morality.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.