Next Target: Iran; Democratic Senators haven’t Learned a thing

By Chris Floyd, ATLANTIC FREE PRESS

As you may know — unless you rely on the corporate media for your news, of course — yesterday the U.S. Senate unanimously declared that Iran was committing acts of war against the United States: a 97-0 vote to give George W. Bush a clear and unmistakable casus belli for attacking Iran whenever Dick Cheney tells him to.

The bipartisan Senate resolution — the brainchild (or rather the bilechild) of Fightin’ Joe Lieberman — affirmed as official fact all of the specious, unproven, ever-changing allegations of direct Iranian involvement in attacks on the American forces now occupying Iraq. The Senators appear to have relied heavily on the recent New York Times story by Michael Gordon that stovepiped unchallenged Pentagon spin directly onto the paper’s front page. As Firedoglake points out, John McCain cited the heavily criticized story on the Senate floor as he cast his vote.

It goes without saying that all of this is a nightmarish replay of the
run-up to the war of aggression against Iraq: The NYT funneling false
flag stories from Bush insiders. Warmongers citing the NYT stories as
“proof” justifying any and all action to “defend the Homeland.”
Credulous and craven Democratic politicians swallowing the Bush line
hook and sinker.

To be sure, stout-hearted Dem tribunes like Dick Durbin insisted that
their support for declaring that Iran is “committing acts of war”
against the United States should not be taken as an “authorization of
military action.” This is shaky-knees mendacity at its finest. Having
officially affirmed that Iran is waging war on American forces, how,
pray tell, can you then deny the president when he asks (if he asks)
for authorization to “defend our troops?” Answer: you can’t. And you
know it.

This vote is the clearest signal yet that there will be no real
opposition to a Bush Administration attack on Iran. This is yet
another blank check from these slavish, ignorant goons; Bush can cash
it anytime. This is, in fact, the post-surge “Plan B” that’s been
mooted lately in the Beltway. As you recall, there was much throwing
about of brains on the subject of reviving the “Iraq Study Group” plan
when the “surge” (or to call it by its right name, the “punitive
escalation”) inevitably fails. Bush put the kibosh on that this week
(”Him not gonna do nothin’ that Daddy’s friends tell him to do! Him a
big boy, him the decider!”), but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a
fall-back position or rather, a spring-forward position: an attack on
Iran, to rally the nation behind the “war leader” and reshuffle the
deck in Iraq.

Of course, the United States is already at war with Iran. We are
directing covert ops and terrorist attacks inside Iran, with the help
of groups that our own government has declared terrorist renegades. We
are kidnapping Iranian officials in Iraq and holding them hostage. We
have a bristling naval armada on Iran’s doorstep, put there for the
express purpose of threatening Tehran with military action. The U.S.
Congress has overwhelmingly passed measures calling for the overthrow
of the Iranian government. And now the U.S. Senate has unanimously
declared that Iran is waging war on America, and has given official
notice that this will not be tolerated. It is only a very small step
to move from this war in all but name to the full monty of an overt
military assault.

We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: there is madness at work
here. There is no other word for it. As I noted a few years ago:

Homo sapiens is the only species that dreams of its own total demise.
Our brief history of conscious thought is replete with vivid scenarios
of the end of life on earth…Religion has produced most of these –
giddy, voluptuous nightmares of universal extinction, usually by fire,
at divine order. A favored remnant is always saved in such tales, of
course, but only after being transformed into some different, higher
order of being. The gross human body — that bleeding, fouling,
endlessly replicating sack of earth — is gleefully consigned to
eternal oblivion.

It seems that some ineradicable nihilism pervades us, like a virus,
now dormant, now flaring: something in us that wants to die, to be
done with the long, overhanging doom of mortality — and to take the
world with us. Our grandiose visions of the future seem to hide, at
their core, a secret, desperate anxiety about the profound
meaninglessness of existence — an anxiety that often disguises itself
in elaborate fantasies of the afterlife, in dreams of “dominance” for
one’s “own kind” (nation, tribe, faith, race, ideology, etc.), or in
the eroticizing of death, war and destruction.

Instincts for preservation, sentiments of affection, the drive for
pleasure — from the most basic bodily urges to the most sublime
creations and apprehensions of the intellect — act as counterweights
to this dark virus, of course. They provide for most of us, most of
the time, enough fragments of meaning — or at least sufficient
distraction — to get on with things, without too much resort to
world-engulfing visions or the extremes of nihilistic anxiety.

On the individual level, the calibration of these competing impulses
can be intricate, subtle, ever-shifting, because the individual mind
is so complex and all-encompassing, yet also so enclosed, so
unlockably private as well: an infinitely supple tool for managing the
conflicts and contradictions of reality. But on the broader level –
species, nation, group — human consciousness is, of necessity, a far
more blunt and brutal instrument.

There, our brain-fevers and anxieties rage more virulently, lacking
the counterweights of individual feeling and the quick, intimate
responsiveness of the private mind. In the group-mind, the fantasies
that root in the muddy fear of meaninglessness can emerge full-blown.
Thought and discourse are reduced to broad strokes, slogans, codes and
incantations, with little correspondence to reality. Awareness of this
tendency can mitigate some of its effects; but the group-mind’s
fundamental falsity and irreality almost invariably infects the
thoughts and actions of group leaders — and eventually many of the
group members as well.

Thus we can sometimes say, not entirely metaphorically, that nations
“go mad,” hurtling themselves toward ruin, embracing self-destruction,
lusting for violence and death, sick with nihilism - although this
sickness iis always painted in the colors of patriotic fervor or
religious zeal, or both….

Now draw these dangerous streams together, and you have a portrait of
the blunt and brutal group-mind at work in the leadership of the
world’s most powerful nation. The folly, fantasy and death-fetish of
the Bush Regime — long evident to anyone who cared to see — were
finally “revealed” in the mainstream media recently by the
quasi-official Establishment oracle, Bob Woodward. His latest insider
portrait, Plan of Attack, offers — in the usual, easily-gummed
pabulum form — a few tastes of the bitter truth behind the Regime’s
mad, ruinous war crime in Iraq.

The corrosive nihilism at the heart of the enterprise ate through the
gaudily-painted surface most tellingly in a single anecdote. Woodward
asks George W. Bush how he thinks history will regard his adventure in
Iraq. Bush, gazing out the window, shrugs and waves the question away.
“History, we don’t know,” he says. “We’ll all be dead.” No fine,
faith-filled talk here about God and Jesus and the immortal soul
responsible for its actions throughout all eternity — the kind of
zealous patter Bush favors in public statements. This was just the
cold, rotten, meaningless core of his grand vision: “We’ll all be
dead.” So who cares? Apres moi, le deluge.

Who would have thought the floodwaters of this death vision would have
risen so high again so soon? Yet here they are again, beating against
the gates.

UPDATE: Jonathan Schwarz points out that all of the Senate’s
Democratic candidates for president voted for Lieberman’s Iran War
amendment: Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama, and Joe Biden. Just in case
you were expecting a saner foreign policy after the 2008 election.

Copyright 2007 Atlantic Free Press

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"a 97-0 vote"

In this age of mis-information, using qualifying references that are of public record will allow those of us who have learned to questions everything -- including the 'independent' press -- to verify information reported. Using thomas.loc.gov, a site that lists all the active legislation, I have found no such resolution. I did find many bills and house resolutions introduced to stop this administration from attacking Iran. True, a bill or H.R. is not binding or law until passed. And I admit I am not an expert on researching legislative actions. Therefore, from now on, shouldn't those who want to make a public outcry, to promote their position, initiate the self-responsibility and reference researchable facts, such as Bill or H.R. numbers? How do we hold our representatives -- governing or reporting -- accountable or trustworthy if we the citizen consumer are not given reference to facts that can be verified in the public record? - psb

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.