Success in Iraq? For Whom?

If you kill and exile and segregate and imprison enough Iraqis and then fudge the reporting on the violence, what will happen? The New York Times will claim success, and Democrats will move from total capitulation to abject servility, thereby revealing their lack of interest in ending the occupation, their indifference to Iraqi deaths, their disdain for international law, their willingness to continue spending our grandchildren's money, their acceptance of the coming attack on Iran, and their incompetence at politics even when they place it above all else. The Times will fail to mention Kucinich of course, except as a footnote in a half sentence at the end aimed at misleadingly portraying him as wrong. Meanwhile, Cheney-Bush cuts troop levels in Iraq by 3% in response to the LACK OF ANY MORE TROOPS TO SEND, and not in response to the bill from Congress that didn't pass the Senate but was designed to take credit for the coming minor troop cut.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Next you send pictures home

You send pictures of a child rescued from "insurgents" who killed the child's whole family but neglect to mention that the insurgents are just trying to get back their country. We will never really know who killed that family. We know that we would not have done so had George Bush not invaded Iraq. It's really sick but the masses want to believe it. My brother sent me that propaganda as a believer.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.