WOULD WAR WITH IRAN HELP OR HURT U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY?

Congressional Progressive Caucus

PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CO-CHAIRS AND MEMBERS TO HOST FIRST IN SERIES OF PUBLIC FORUMS AND AD HOC HEARINGS: WOULD WAR WITH IRAN HELP OR HURT U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY?

Who: Progressive Caucus Co-Chairwomen Barbara Lee and Lynn Woolsey, and U.S. Representatives Peter DeFazio and Dennis Kucinich, and additional Progressive Caucus Members hosting:

• Ms. Samantha Power – Executive Director of the Carr Center for Human Rights at Harvard University and author of the widely-acclaimed, thought-provoking book entitled “A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide.” She will address: The Use of Force and Key Questions About the Bush Doctrine of Preemptive Warfare in the Post 9/11 World.

• Dr. Jessica Tuchman Matthews – President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and author of “Power Shift”, which was chosen by the editors of Foreign Affairs Magazine as one of the most influential articles in that journal’s 75 years of publication. She will address: U.S. – Iran Relations: Would War with Iran Help or Hurt U.S. National Security?

What: This is the first in an on-going series of public forums and ad hoc
Congressional hearings to be hosted by the Progressive Caucus and featuring
some of our nation’s most thoughtful historians, statesmen, public policy
analysts, and scholars to share their insights and advice on the growing
confrontation with the Government of Iran and more broadly on the Bush
doctrine of preemptive warfare as national security strategy

When: May 24th from 3:00 – 5:00 P.M.

Where: HC-9 in the U.S. Capitol

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Would living in a lawless world help anyone's security?

Because, underlying all the incidentals about which perceived potential threat to U.S. "full spectrum dominance" to preempt next, that's the key question.

Societal relationships, whether interpersonal or international, require a set of mutually agreed and mutually accepted rules if they are to work at all. No single party can simply exempt itself with impunity. Strange and incomprehensible as it may seem to some, the U.S. isn't the only nation with security concerns.

When you tear up the rule book, its constraints and protections don't just disappear for others. You can no longer claim them for yourself either. Well, you can claim them, I suppose, but your hypocritical pleas aren't likely to return anything but sardonic laughter. Now and then, interspersed with the screams of tortured souls and the thunderous silence of slaughtered innocents, I think I hear it rising already.
__

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power" -- Benito Mussolini

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.