Priorities

Thank you for the link

Those two can't even understand and obama is just as power hungry as the rest of the scums.

And I Will not support ralph nader due to the connections with another CFR Piece of scum michael bloomberg (who like ghouliani turned ny into disneyland).

Thank God Ron Paul's a senator again, he may have lost in 2008, but his revolution will be around forever.

It never ceases to amaze me that so many people think Hillary Clinton would make a good President. Just because she's demonstrating her ambitions by staying in the Presidential race with all of the tenacity of a bulldog shouldn't earn her any kind of congratulations or commendation.

So ... she refuses to back out of the race because of the seeming juggernaut that Barack Obama has become, and her decision to yield to her ambitions has earned her the congratulations of a few people in certain political circles because she's demonstrating "vital leadership quality" and showing "courage under fire".

Yes, Barack Obama has the skeletons of his dealings with Antoin "Tony" Rezko in his closet, but Hillary Clinton -- along with her husband, Bill -- have a political mass graveyard, filled with all sorts of skeletons which are inevitably going to be unearthed, if not by Obama's campaign, then (most assuredly) by the Republicans and their shadowy right-wing offshoot groups, who will attempt to "Swift Boat" Hillary using the same tactics they were able to derail John Kerry's 2004 Presidential campaign.

Then, you've got Hillary attempting to position herself as a "voice for the voiceless", by her feeble attempt to invoke the image of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who said he would represent the "forgotten man" in his campaign for
President at the peak of the Depression in 1932. FDR made that campaign promise only after the nation had been wracked with wave after wave of public unrest, massive riots by unemployed workers in major cities across the country and acts of open rebellion, including the rebellion of the World War I veterans, known as the "Bonus Army", who descended upon Washington en masse in the last year of the Hoover Administration to demand that Congress act to help aid them and their families, who were on the verge of starvation.

But, not only do you have Hillary attempting to present herself as the female reincarnation of FDR, she has reworked her political campaign in order to convince an apolitical, ahistorical American populace that "hope" is not just a word, but depends on a fight against the corporate cartels which have been looting the nation, but here's where we have a BIG problem ... there are too many political skeletons in the Clinton Cemetary, including Whitewater, questions about where she got the money to prop up her campaign, the mysterious deaths of Vince Foster and Ron Brown, and her time on the board of directors of Wal-Mart.

How can Hillary, as President, effectively address the effects of the collapsing economy and financial system, which are hitting the vast majority of Americans with devastating force when she voted to reform the bankruptcy laws so the banks came out on the "winning" end?

She may have sharply refocused her campaign toward the economic desperation of the unemployed and the declining "middle class" in Ohio and Texas during the primaries, and the growing fears of millions that they face losing their jobs, their homes, and access to medical care, but it's still all show and no substance, because she's playing on their fears and uncertainties in the same manner Karl Rove did when he ran G.W. Bush's 2004 re-election campaign.

We need somone who accurately reflects the REAL America and its core values, and who possesses both the morals and substance in order to demonstrate true "courage under fire" and "vital leadership qualities". Unfortunately, we had such a candidate in our midst, until the oligarch-controlled MSM marginalized him out of existence. His name? Dennis Kucinich.

But it's the democrats (Obama & Hillary) war also, they knew what they did and they followed, if obama was against the war from the start, why didn't he fillerbuster it to stop it, because he funded this war 25 times, he and hillary tried and they have failed.

We have killed more soliders in iraq then those people that were killed in the 11th of september, not to mention thousands of iraq civilians

Both parties have failed miserably.

We must kick both parties out of office.

Makes me so glad, I Left the democratic party last year.

Thank God Ron Paul's a senator again, he may have lost in 2008, but his revolution will be around forever.

Hillary Clinton is just a power-mad woman who wants to be the first woman president of the United States. That has nothing to do with our benefit. It is all about her. I do not want her to be the first woman president of the United States. She is not a bit better than McCain. I will not vote for either of them. Cynthia McKinney stands ready to be the first black and woman president of the United States. So if you really want a woman, your prayers are answered.
4Peace

What is this "OUR" crap? She's not our nominee, she's the Democratic Party nominee. You don't know why we we're against Hillary? I know why. She voted to authorize the invasion of Iraq and has continually voted to fund the occupation. She supports attacking Iran too. She supports the Afghanistan occupation also. She promotes aggression against Venezuela also. She votes for all legislation that takes away our civil rights and liberties. There are a million reasons not to vote for Hillary, Obama, or McCain. The Iraq war is illegal because it violates the US Constitution and the UN Charter. Bush's lies are an excuse for Congress to pretend they were deceived. The only legal basis for any country to go to war is if that country is attacked or one of its allies is attacked. The only times America has ever been attacked by a foreign country was when England attacked us in the Revolutionary war and the War of 1812 and when Japan attacked the US in World War 2.

...by Bush/Cheney/Rice lies and fraud, in my eyes, anyway, were those who wanted to be fooled. To me, Hillary for sure, and Obama, probably, are just the softer-guy face of the good-guy/tough-guy head of whatever the outfit is that pulls the strings in DC, and around the world.

Kucinich was the only one out there who was willing to try and hold the Bush/Cheney CABAL accountable, and I supported him as much as I could.

Now that he's not there anymore, I'm going to support Nader. I don't think he has a snowball's chance in hell to get anywhere (in fact, I believe he'd drop out if he actually thought he would win), but he's the only one out there who can flush these pretenders out into the open enough to where everybody can see where they stand.

However people choose to vote is their business, and I'm not out to change anybody's mind, but I'd like to see it be perfectly clear to everybody just what their choices are.

Have an informed run-up to the election, everybody--seriously.

R Ap