A Picture Worth A Thousand Words

Newspaper Criticized For Publishing Photo
By Helen Thomas, Hearst White House columnist

07/05/08 "Hearst Newspapers" -- -- WASHINGTON -- Some readers resented The Washington Post for publishing an Associated Press photograph of a critically wounded Iraqi child being lifted from the rubble of his home in Baghdad’s Sadr City “after a U.S. airstrike.”

Two-year-old Ali Hussein later died in a hospital.

As the saying goes, the picture was worth a thousand words because it showed the true horrors of this war.
Click here to find out more!

Neither side is immune from the killing of Iraqi civilians. But Americans should be aware of their own responsibility for inflicting death and pain on the innocent.

The Post’s ombudsman, Deborah Howell, said about 20 readers complained about the photo, while a few readers praised the Post for publishing the stark picture on page one.

Some mothers said they were offended that their children might see the picture, though one wonders whether their youngsters watch television and play with violent videos in a pretend world.

From the start of the unprovoked U.S. “shock and awe” invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003, the government tried to bar the news media from photographing flag-draped coffins of American soldiers returning from Iraq. A Freedom of Information lawsuit forced the government to release pictures of returning coffins.

Howell said some readers felt the photo of the Iraqi boy was “an anti-war statement; some thought it was in poor taste.” Well, so is war.

Howell said her boss, Executive Editor Len Downie, “is cautious about such photos.”

“We have seldom been able to show the human impact of the fighting on Iraqis,” Downie was quoted as saying. “We decided this was a rare instance in which we had a powerful image with which to do so.”

It’s unclear to me why this was deemed to be “rare.” After five years of war, there is finally one photo that is supposed to say it all?

Howell said she checked hundreds of U.S. front pages on the Internet but saw the AP photo nowhere else.

This makes me wonder why the media have shied away from telling the story about Iraqi civilian casualties. News people and editors were more courageous during the Vietnam War. What are they afraid of now?

Who can forget the shocking picture of the little Vietnamese girl running down a road, aflame from a napalm attack? And who can forget the picture of South Vietnamese police chief Nguyen Ngoc Loan putting a gun to the temple of a young member of the Viet Cong and executing him on a Saigon street?

I don’t remember any American outcry against the press for showing the horror of war when these photographs were published. Were we braver then? Or maybe more conscience stricken?

Of course, the Pentagon did not enjoy such images coming out of Saigon in that era. Most Americans found them appalling, as further evidence of our misbegotten venture in Vietnam. Americans rallied to the streets in protest and eventually persuaded President Lyndon Johnson to give up his dreams of reelection in 1968.

Some Americans believe the media were to blame for the U.S. defeat in Vietnam. Nonsense.

Johnson knew the war was unwinnable, especially after the 1968 Tet offensive and the request by Army Gen. William Westmoreland for 200,000 more troops, in addition to the 500,000 already in Vietnam.

The Pentagon made a command decision after the Vietnam War to get better control of the dissemination of information in future wars.

This led then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to create an office of disinformation at the start of the Iraqi war. It was later disbanded after howls from the media.

More recently we have seen the Pentagon’s propaganda efforts take the form of carefully coaching retired generals about how to spin the Iraq war when they appear on television as alleged military experts. The New York Times’ revelations about these pet generals have cast a pall over their reputations.

Too often in this war, the news media seem to have tried to shield the public from the suffering this war has brought to Americans and Iraqis.

It’s not the job of the media to protect the nation from the reality of war. Rather, it is up to the media to tell the people the truth. They can handle it.

Helen Thomas can be reached at hthomas@hearstdc.com

Copyright 2008 by Hearst Newspapers

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

A thousand words cannot begin to describe this picture

I can hardly breathe looking at this child, but publishing photos like this is exactly what will stir Americans to see the freedom and democracy the neocons have spread to Iraq and Afghanistan Based On Lies.

You'd think Faux-News Corp would be plastering this inhumanity all over all their networks and newspapers, myspace and directv, what with their focus on TERROR and SENSATIONALISM as a substitute for Content. But alas, it was the Americans again, "Patriotic Bombers" who executed this boy, so they'll just have to leave this photo in the non-fascist press.

ixoxi

I Agree! It Is Heartbreaking!!

And that is why Bush & Co. have striven so valiantly to hide the reality of this war from the American people. They knew if we were looking at dead bodies, injured civilians and returning coffins on the nightly news, they'd have been forced to come clean about this war and/or wrap it up long ago. And they were very, very good at cowing us all with veiled references to "people better watch what they say" and "you are either with us or with the terrorists." I plead guilty to having been successfully intimidated, right along with the main stream media. Certain others, like Graydon Carter, editor of Vanity Fair, never were, and I tip my hat to him. Perhaps now, even this late in the day, it is time for other media outlets to play "catch up" with reality photos. Not for sensational or exploitative purposes, but to illustrate real "reality" for a change. It is war, and that does imply horrid damage, unspeakable injury and grisly death. The president wants more money from us for his war. Why can't we, then, see exactly what he wants us to "buy" more of?

Your "click here" doesn't

Your "click here" doesn't work, David.

Another sorrowful mother's day,

and father's day. When is innocent children murdered day? Oh, yes, everyday, so not really noteworthy.
What a picture.

Would suggest all of us send to our reps' offices. I generally send these things to my own address and then send out so they don't (if inclined) automatically delete any ADS mails. They at least will get to the picture before shutting down. Sending test to self to see how it comes up.

Thank you Helen Thomas!

"When is innocent children murdered day?"

I believe "Innocent Children Murdered Day" was during January 2001... the same as "Neocon HiJacking of the US Constitution Day"...

ixoxi

FYI-Sending this out works.

Sometimes pics don't come out with forwards. Does happen with this forward, so send out to your reps and friends, please.

I was so moved by this

I was so moved by this photo, I ended up doing a piece about it at my site. It'll be days before this image fades from the front of my mind.:
http://goodgirlroxie.blogspot.com/2008/05/do-not-click-on-link_08.html

It'll be "years" before this will fade

I went over and read your piece and it comes through real clear for me. It reminded me of this lead-in to a letter to the editor I submitted while the US military was scurrying north into Baghdad and ran into a sand-storm that froze all military advancement... two of my local papers DID NOT publish it:

"and god threw sand into the apache’s eyes
Drew wealth out of pockets dry
They sensed in their awe of their power
A withering spoon and agony on the table

They did it well, that monstrous act of humanity
They thought themselves servants of good deed
And saviour of ideologue, with god speed
‘xcept the speck in their eye, the spec, of humility

Should our cupboards run bare
And bombs fly through our houses
I hope we remember to forgive
Our enemies who sent us there"

ixoxi

Both sides responsible for the killing?

Is that right? I need to check my map. Last time I looked Iraq was about half way across the world from America. It would see that people living in their own country are not responsible for another country attacking them and killing their children.

The Iraqi people are not responsible for us being in their country -- George Bush is and his is a war criminal. Had America not attacked and bombed that child's home we could be safe in believing he would still be alive today.

Oops, I forgot GWB is pro-life for the unborn that he isn't killing with DU.
4Peace

Rhetorical question

"...some readers felt the photo of the Iraqi boy was 'an anti-war statement...'."

Do the same readers acknowledge then that pictures of happy, smiling Iraqis are pro-war statements and worthy of rejection as propaganda?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.