Impeachment Hearings: A Win is a Win
By Dave Lindorff
There are two ways to view the news that the House Judiciary Committee will be holding a hearing on impeachable crimes by President George W. Bush.
One view would be that this is all a charade and that after all, it will not be a real impeachment hearing, but rather, simply a hearing into the impeachable crimes of the Bush administration. As committee Chair Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) put it, “We’re not doing impeachment, but he [Rep. Dennis Kucinich, who introduced 36 articles of impeachment] can talk about it.” Viewed that way, this is not such a big deal. Rep. Kucinich gets to make his case that the president is committing high crimes and misdemeanors and abuses of power and war crimes, but then Congressional Democrats will continue to ignore all the crimes as it has done since taking control of Congress in November 2006.
But a second way to view this is as a significant victory over the quisling Congressional leadership, which has been ducking its responsibility to defend the Constitution and to stand up for the rule of law not just since November 2006, but since the inception of the Bush/Cheney presidency.
I go for the second interpretation of events. It is clear, as was beautifully laid out in an article published by Glenn Greenwald in Salon magazine on July 15, that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and the rest of the Democratic Party leadership both in Congress and in the party organization, have been blocking any action on impeachment for fear of having their own complicity in Bush's and Cheney's crimes revealed. As Greenwald notes, the Washington Post has reported that Pelosi, along with Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) were briefed on the administration's use of torture and not only didn't object, but actively encouraged it. Rockefeller and Harman, who at the time were minority leaders of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees at the time, were also briefed about Bush's order to the National Security Agency to conduct warrantless spying on Americans. They didn't object or publicly expose this blatant violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Fourth Amendment. And of course, many, if not most of the House and Senate Democratic leadership as well as many of the rank-and-file members of the party in both houses backed Bush's illegal war on Iraq, and his USA PATRIOT Act.
No wonder Pelosi, even before winning control of Congress and being elected Speaker, made it clear that under her "leadership" (if it can be called that), impeachment of either Bush or Cheney would be "off the table."
Looked at in this light, the fact that the House just voted 251-166 to send Kucinich's 36 articles of impeachment to the Judiciary Committee for a hearing, that Pelosi has had to buckle, and that Conyers has agreed to hold even an "informational" hearing on impeachment, at which Kucinich, Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), and other impeachment advocates in the House will be able to present their case about the president's crimes and abuses of power, constitutes a major victory of principle over cowardice, of integrity over complicity, of the Constitution over creeping fascism. (24 Republicans joined in voting to send the articles to the committee.)
The fact is that public demands to hold this criminal administration accountable for its crimes against the Constitution, the American people and the global community, have been mounting and have reached a point that the Democratic leadership, as terrified as it is of impeachment and of the accompanying airing of its own complicity in those crimes, has been forced to allow an airing of those crimes.
Now I don't expect Rep. Kucinich to bite the hand that feeds him. He will not present the impeachment case in a way that criticizes those leaders. Indeed, he has publicly thanked both Pelosi and Conyers for allowing a hearing on impeachment. But it would be surprising if Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee didn't make those points. And that's good. Even if real impeachment hearings never actually come to pass, we will be treated, finally, to a public airing of not just the president's and vice president's crimes, but of the Democratic Party leadership's participation in them.
The challenge now will be for the American people and for the wide-spread and decentralized impeachment movement, and all progressive, anti-war and civil liberties organizations, to press Conyers and the Judiciary Committee to take it to the next level. If Kucinich, Wexler and others do their job, and if we all demand that the corporate media report on the hearings, Americans will finally know the extent of this administration's crimes against the Constitution, and the nature of the threat it poses to democracy and freedom in America. At that point it will be time to demand that the Judiciary Committee move to constitute itself as a formal Impeachment Committee, with full power to subpoena and demand the appearance of witnesses in a real impeachment hearing.
The hour is getting late, but there is still time to bring this criminal administration to justice.
American voters may forgive leaders like Pelosi, Harman, Rockefeller and others for failing to stand up to Bush and Cheney if their names get dragged through the mud of an impeachment hearing, but the American people will never forgive them or the rest of the Congress if it allows these two men to leave office next January without tar and feathers on their backs and a federal grand jury on their cases.
Call your representative today and every day (at 202-224-3121) and demand that he or she co-sponsor some or all of Rep. Kucinich's 36 bills of impeachment, and join the call for real impeachment hearings. Send them an email. And sign the petition calling for impeachment hearings.
We are witnessing a backdown by the House leadership. It's time to push harder. Impeachment hearings, and impeachment itself, can happen!
____________
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and now available in paperback). His work is available at ThisCantBeHappening.net
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
- Spotlight this page



The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison
Nonviolent Struggle: 50 Crucial Points
George W. Bush, War Criminal?: The Bush Administration's Liability for 269 War Crimes
Nonviolence: Twenty-Five Lessons from the History of a Dangerous Idea
A Force More Powerful: A Century of Nonviolent Conflict
Waging Nonviolent Struggle: 20th Century Practice and 21st Century Potential
A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr.
The 35 Articles of Impeachment and the Case for Prosecuting George W. Bush
The Trial of Donald Rumsfeld
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law
United States v. George W. Bush et al.
The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism
Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush
The Impeachment of George W. Bush: A Practical Guide for Concerned Citizens
The Case for Impeachment
Impeach the President: The Case Against Bush and Cheney
George W. Bush versus the U.S. Constitution: The Downing Street Memos and Deception, Manipulation, Torture, Retribution, and Cover-ups in the Iraq War and Illegal Domestic Spying
Verdict and Findings of Fact
Impeach Bush: A Funny Li'l Graphical Novel About the Worstest Pres'dent in the History of Forevar
Pretensions to Empire: Notes on the Criminal Folly of the Bush Administration
The Twilight of Democracy: The Bush Plan for America













www.VelvetRevolution.us
the criminals are investigating the criminals
Greenwald got it right. The reason for Congress not enforcing the law is because the criminals are investigating the criminals.
All of Hitler's atrocities were "legalized" by the complicit criminals in the German Parliament. Although Dennis's heart is in the right place, thank God we didn't rely on a Kucinich-like ambassador to Germany to stop the Nazis.
Sure, the public MAY be treated to a Judiciary Show where the two entrenched congressional "crime families" try to make "their" gangsters out to be better than the others. But the fatal outcome is, come November, the American people will still be controlled by the Democratic/Republican "Black Hand."
Folks like Cindy Sheehan and Cynthia McKinney have finally seen the way out of our two-party cesspool, and are doing more to correct the problem than could ever be expected from a Democratic or Republican led Judiciary Committee.
Forget calling and emailing your locally elected thug for impeachment. A contribution to Cindy's or Cynthia's campaign is worth at least a thousand times more.
question
re: Forget calling and emailing your locally elected thug for impeachment. A contribution to Cindy's or Cynthia's campaign is worth at least a thousand times more.
why would one have to be exclusive of the other thomas? do you have a problem with a little truth coming out? whether you like it or not they exist and it's our duty to call on them to do the right thing. why would you suggest citizens abdicate their responsibilities?
think beyond the cesspool
I have no problem, whatsoever, with any truth coming out. I have been eagerly watching the truth come out since at least the Downing Street memo. What's destroying my faith in humanity is that no one is doing what truth and justice demand.
You are absolutely right, Cheryl, with your challenge on exclusivity. One does not preclude the other. But I hope you sense the greater value of challenging the Black Hand vs playing by its rules.
To rephrase a few words from the greatest document ever written: Whenever a long train of governmental abuses evinces a design of transferring power from the people to a couple colluding "gangs," it is not only our right, but our DUTY, to throw off such government and institute new safeguards for our security.
Though lobbying gang members and playing by the rules established by the gangs might be a prudent first step in accomplishing any necessary changes, it should be obvious why these procedures have failed, and probably will continue to fail.
So by all means, call and email to your heart's content. But I suggest it is an abdication of responsibility if what you are doing isn't directly challenging the two-party base the world's latest empire firmly rests upon.
Now is the time to act
Thank you for this, Dave! And thank goodness Greenwald has written about the facts re complicity that I have been trying to research / grok!
I agree with Cheryl... Doing EVERYthing we can n-o-w is imperative. (Don't worry, Thomas, I'm a lifelong Independent and for the first time in my life will NOT be voting Democratic for the presidential candidate this year, but that has nothing to do with whether or not impeachment activists should pay attention to this current moment.)
The American citizenry must become informed about what has happened on their watch the past 7 1/2 years so that eventually we WILL vote in ethical politicians and WILL understand our duty to hold them accountable (incl. all candidates DURING the current electoral season) and to guard our Constitution once we ever get it restored.
Regardless of votes in the Senate to "convict," what *I* have been calling for is that the House pass Articles of Impeachment so that the public can HEAR the ensuing investigation in the Senate. And with Kucinich's bills in the Judiciary, THAT is the place any action will begin.
I am for ANY massive actions needed in order to demand that Kucinich et al be heard (a)by the Judiciary members and (b)by the public. My belief has always been that only comprehensive nationwide strikes and boycotts will effect ACTION on impeachment. But the will of the country has not been there, and it would take a miracle to have people participate in a sustained "stay home" action at this late date.
SO... p-l-e-a-s-e, everyone, DO call your Representative--no matter how useless they are, they are up for re-election--and ask them to co-sponsor H.Res.1258 AND to sponsor their own bill on an impeachable offense committed by Bush.
Then absolutely contact every single member of the Judiciary, starting with the Dems ('tho Wexler and Baldwin have signed onto H.Res.1258). Following are fax numbers! Also call and send postcards, as you're able!
House Judiciary Committee members:
Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz [D, FL] Fax: 202-226-2052
Representative Melvin L. Watt [D, NC] (On the Subcommittee on the Constitution Civil Rights and Civil Liberties) Fax: 202-225-1512
Representative Zoe Lofgren [D, CA] Fax: 202-225-3336
Representative Steve Ira Cohen [D, TN-9] Fax: 202-225-5663
Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee [D, TX-18] Fax: 202-225-3317
Representative Howard L. Berman [D, CA] Fax: 202-225-3196
Representative Rick Boucher [D, VA] Fax: 202-225-0442
Representative Robert C. Scott [D, VA] (On the Subcommittee on the Constitution Civil Rights and Civil Liberties) Fax: 202-225-8354
Representative Maxine Waters [D, CA] Fax: 202-225-7854
Representative William Delahunt [D, MA] Fax: 202-225-5658
Representative Linda T. Sanchez [D, CA] Fax: 202-226-1012
Representative Hank Johnson [D, GA] Fax: 202-226-0691
Representative Betty Sutton [D, OH] Fax: 202-225-2266
Representative Luis V. Gutierrez [D, IL] Fax: 202-225-7810
Representative Brad Sherman [D, CA] Fax: 202-225-5879
Representative Anthony Weiner [D, NY] Fax: 202-226-7253
Representative Adam Schiff [D, CA] Fax: 202-225-5828
Representative Artur Davis [D, AL] (On the Subcommittee on the Constitution Civil Rights and Civil Liberties) Fax: 202-226-9567
Representative Keith Ellison [D, MN-5] (On the Subcommittee on the Constitution Civil Rights and Civil Liberties) Fax: 202-225-4886
Representative Robert Wexler [D, FL-19] Fax: 202-225-5974
Representative Tammy Baldwin [D, WI-2] Fax: 202-225-6942
Representative Trent Franks [R, AZ] (Ranking Member) Fax: 202-225-6328
Representative Lamar Smith [R, TX] (On the Subcommittee on the Constitution Civil Rights and Civil Liberties) Fax: 202-225-8628
Representative F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. [R, WI] Fax: 202-225-3190
Representative Elton Gallegly [R, CA] Fax: 202-225-1100
Representative Bob Goodlatte [R, VA] Fax: 202-225-9681
Representative Steve Chabot [R, OH] Fax: 202-225-3012
Representative Dan Lungren [R, CA] Fax: 202-226-1298
Representative Chris Cannon [R, UT] Fax: 202-225-5629
Represenative Ric Keller [R, FL] Fax: 202-225-0999
Representative Darrell Issa [R, CA] Fax: 202-225-3303
Representative Mike Pence [R, IN] Fax: 202-225-3382
Representative J. Randy Forbes [R, VA] Fax: 202-226-1170
Representative Steve King [R, IA] Fax: 202-225-3193
Representative Tom Feeney [R, FL] Fax: 202-226-6299
Representative Louie Gohmert [R, TX] Fax: 202-226-1230
Representative Jim Jordan [R, OH] Fax: 202-226-0577
Representative Howard Coble [R, NC] Fax: 202-225-8611
"Traditional nationalism cannot survive the fissioning of the atom. One world or none."
--Stuart Chase
So, just how many o/t HJC will show up?
Are you picturing 5-10? Maybe more than 30? Will they remain for the entire hearing? Or, will most make a appearance and leave? Will Hoyer fill the day with "action in the House" to protect Pelosi, Reed and Bushco?
Ultimately, "they" want to know how far they have to go to convince "you" that "they" mean NO IMPEACHMENT when they say it.
Calling? I call now only to shame and show all the contempt toward MOCs that I can muster. This kind of calling actually improves one's skills in using sarcasm and irony, which we will need increasingly in the months ahead.
Let's not forget how long we have been at this - we are officially into our F-O-U-R-T-H year.
VOTE NADER OR VOTE MCKINNEY AND VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT AN INCUMBENT. AND HOPE THAT SOMEONE IS ACCURATELY COUNTING YOUR VOTES.
Throw the bumbs out!
Throw the bumbs out.
Anyone would be better than the 9% approval rated scum bags temporarily occupying OUR representives' seats. You can count on less than 2 hands all the incumbants deserving of re-election. DK and Sanders being the most prominant. Unless you have a clear cut pre-1980 style representative, vote for the "other guy/gal". You will be advancing democracy more than any bag of letters/faxes or slew of email mails could ever acheive.