Pelosi Clashes With Protesters Over Impeachment
Pelosi Clashes With Protesters Over Impeachment
By Jason Leopold and Alan Breslauer | The Public Record
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's appearance Monday at a West Los Angeles college to discuss her recently published book was marred by dozens of protestors and several angry outbursts by audience members who demanded Pelosi immediately authorize a House committee to hold impeachment hearings against President George W. Bush.
The Speaker made it clear she would not support any effort to hold impeachment hearings against President Bush saying that the president "will be gone in a hundred days."
Chip's Note: Be sure to watch the commercial at the end - twice I got John McCain. Now, on to the rest of the article by Jason Leopold and Alan Breslauer.
Halfway through her discussion at The American University of Judaism, where more than 300 people paid $30 each to hear Pelosi speak about her upbringing and her family's impact on her political career as detailed in her book Know Your Power: A Message to America’s Daughters, the topic shifted to Congress's historically low approval rating and how it reflected on Pelosi’s tenure as Speaker.
American University of Judaism's Rabbi Robert Wexler, who moderated the 75 minute discussion, asked Pelosi to analyze a recent Rasmussen poll that found nine percent of voters dpolled believed Congress was doing a good job, far lower than President Bush's overall approval rating.
According to the results of the July poll, 72 percent of voters believe Congress is more interested in furthering their own political careers. Fourteen percent believe members of Congress are genuinely interested in helping people.
Pelosi responded to the statistics by defending her performance and the performance of her Democratic colleagues in Congress.
"I preside over the greatest collection of integrity and idealism," Pelosi said.
Prior to her appearance in West Los Angeles Monday evening, CNN’s Larry King interviewed Pelosi. She told King she was willing to drop her staunch opposition to offshore drilling and would likely allow the House to vote on the issue.
She said, in her opinion, the reason behind Congress’s historically low approval rating was largely due to the fact that Democrats could not muster up the votes to end the Iraq war, which the Democratic Speaker from San Francisco said she could not do much about because of the Democrats’ razor-thin majority in both Houses.
Wexler, however, continued to press Pelosi to elaborate on her response given that the Rasmussen poll suggested that a wide-range of issues beyond the Iraq war was responsible for Congress’s single-digit approval. Pelosi, visibly flustered, said she was well aware that “much more work needs to be done.”
In November 2006, Pelosi explained the significance behind the record voter turnout that helped shift the balance of power in Washington for the first time in 12 years.
“People voted for change and they voted for Democrats who will take our country in a new direction,” Pelosi said during a victory speech in San Francisco on Nov. 8, 2006.
But Pelosi, who became House Speaker, never managed to exact the change she promised. She explained that she and her colleagues tried vigorously to pass legislation to end the war in Iraq.
"The public doesn’t want to know about process and 60 votes, they want outcomes, they want results," Pelosi said, explaining why Democrats could not end the war as promised prior to the midterm 2006 elections.
But Pelosi’s comments appeared disingenuous to many, since she was largely responsible for crafting an appropriations bill in backroom discussions with House Democratic leaders, passed in June, and then worked secretly with the White House budget director offering up concessions on Iraq war benchmarks if Bush would agree to the domestic spending attached to the final bill with little debate preceding a vote on the measure.
In fact, since the electoral victories in November 2006, the Democratic-controlled Congress has approved more than $300 billion in emergency spending bills for Iraq and Afghanistan without the benchmarks or withdrawal timetables that Pelosi and other leaders said they would demand.
When Pelosi launched into the reasons an administration led by presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain would be dangerous for the country, identifying the candidate's support for an endless war in Iraq and his intention to uphold many of the questionable constitutional interpretations relating to torture and civil liberties during the Bush administration, Pelosi said the only way to "dig our way out" is by electing Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee.
“Whether it’s the deficit or the challenges to the constitution we have to dig our way out,” Pelosi said, adding “this election is like death for life on this planet as we know it today."
Her response led Peter Thottam, founder of the LA Impeachment Center, to demand Pelosi "do her job" and pursue impeachment hearings against President Bush for launching a war on false pretenses.
"Who gave you the right to take the constitution and shove it down the toilet? Who gave you the right to take impeachment off the table? Nobody told them to do this,” Thottam shouted at Pelosi moments before Secret Service agents removed him from the packed auditorium and turned him over to officers with the Los Angeles Police Department. “One million Iraqis are dead. Five thousand Americans are dead. You have destroyed the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth and Eighth Amendments."
Pelosi seemed stunned by the outburst, but the way she addressed Thottam’s charges further fanned the flames and led to additional verbal protests over her decision not to hold the administration accountable for what many individuals in the audience believe are High Crimes and Misdemeanors by President Bush.
When a member of the activist group Code Pink stood up and insisted Pelosi brush up on her reading regarding evidence of the Bush administration's long list of alleged constitutional violations, Pelosi reacted angrily.
"I take an oath of office to uphold the constitution of the United States and don't tell me that I don't do that,” Pelosi said, using hand gestures to emphasize her disdain over the impeachment demands. "Why don't you go picket the Republicans in Congress that will not allow us to have a vote on the war. This is not very effective. Not very effective."
"As Speaker of the house, the third highest office, first is the president, then vice president, and then Speaker, I take my responsibilities deadly seriously,” Pelosi said. “I try to promote bipartisanship but that's not what the other side wants."
Before Election 2006, Pelosi declared impeachment “off the table,” in part, to avoid alarming centrist voters. Now, with Democrats hoping to gain additional seats in Election 2008, a similar political calculation applies, fearing a backlash against a last-minute drive to impeach Bush and Cheney. Bush knows that Pelosi long ago rejected impeachment proceedings, the one instrument included in the Constitution for Congress to wield against a President who has abused his powers.
Pelosi's refusal to consider impeachment hearings or cut off funding for the Iraq war prompted antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan last year to launch a campaign for Pelosi's congressional seat. On Monday, San Francisco election officials said Sheehan has obtained enough registered voters on her petitions to be placed on the November ballot. Sheehan, whose son Casey was killed in Iraq in 2004, is running as an Independent.
At the conclusion of Monday evening’s presentation, Pelosi signed books but refused to answer questions about her policy decisions. The Public Record asked Pelosi whether she would authorize the full House to vote on contempt charges against former White House political adviser Karl Rove, who has refused to comply with a congressional subpoena to testify about his role in the alleged political prosecution of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman, a Democrat.
Immediately following his query to Pelosi, The Public Record's Alan Breslauer was grabbed by Secret Service and dragged away from the table where Pelosi was signing copies of her book. The Speaker did respond to Breslauer's question, however, saying a vote on contempt charges against Rove is "up to [House Judiciary Committee Chairman] Conyers."
Jason Leopold is Editor-in-Chief of The Public Record. Alan Breslauer is a frequent contributor to BradBlog and maintains a personal blog, HotPotatoMash. He can be reached at hotpotatomash@gmail.com
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
- Spotlight this page




















www.VelvetRevolution.us
Nancy Pelosi should be in Hell.
Way to go Los Angeles!! I doubt Nancy Pelosi will ever come back to LA again. Now if we can just get Cindy to replace her.
Three Ads
9/11 truth and Iraq
Impeach Cheney
Do you approve of Nancy Pelosi?
Pelosi's Oath of Abdication
Pelosi recalls her oath to uphold the Constitution but it's just a faded memory. Before she even took the oath and got herself sworn in she took the Constitution, along with impeachment, "off the table", thereby insuring she would not be honoring her oath anytime soon. Pelosi accomodated the Republicans beyond their wildest dreams, allowing them their imperial president, with the powers of a monarch, but should a democratic president ever get elected after the reign of a king, those very same Republicans will be recalling their oaths and raising the rafters for impeachment as long as it's a democrat, any democrat.
Giving Jews a bad name.
It is particularly unfortunate that Nancy chose a Jewish venue to blabber on about how empowered she is and how she took an oath of office, Just because she took an oath of office does not mean she is honoring it. Did she take an oath to kill over a million Iraqis and almost 5000 Americans for lies (oil) too?
4Peace
It's not the Jews fault
All of this misery is the work of the Zionists who pretend to be Jews.
That's what I have been trying to explain to the public for years. Zionists are the sub-human lying mass murderers who whine about "anti-Semitism" every time their criminal activity is revealed, which makes them rotten to the core.
Zionists themselves made this into a difficult issue with their propaganda/public relations campaigns.
They exploit someone's religion as an excuse to justify evil.
And they got away with it for a long time. Just look at the narcissistic arrogance of Pelosi.
What can I say?
AIPAC is Israel's AL QAEDA !!!
AIPAC should be banned from USA like any terrorist organization.
IMPEACH BUSHCO & RICO PNAC/AIPAC...PNAC is Bush/Cheney's "Helter Skelter" !
WE MUST DEFEAT MCCAIN!!! "KNOW HER POMPOSITY" IS A FLOP!
Criminal fraud Pelosi playing the American people for fools
"I take an oath of office to uphold the constitution of the United States and don't tell me that I don't do that."
Notice her failure to legitimately refute the allegation (because doing so is impossible). She is unquestionably in violation of her oath. She just doesn't want to be constantly reminded of her betrayal of the American people and our military.
Poor Nancy. It's always ugly when the last vestiges of conscience find cracks in the political armor of those who have sold their souls for positions of power.
If the stakes were not so serious, it would be laughable for Pelosi to claim to not have any evidence of Bush crimes. Especially after Dennis Kucinich spent nearly five hours reading 35 fully documented articles of impeachment into the record on the floor of the House that she controls.
The claim that Congress needs to pass a law to get us out of Iraq is another pathetic lie that preys on the general public's lack of understanding of how things work on Capitol Hill. All she has to do is refuse to bring any bill that funds the "war" to the floor for a vote. The Pretender-in-Chief would then be forced to use funds already in the pipeline to initiate withdrawal.
The notion that such an effort would reveal a lack of support for our troops is beyond ridiculous. The effort to bring them home from the wholesale fraud that is Bushco's illegal occupation of Iraq can only show that we take their commitment to our country seriously, and that we understand that they must not be sent into battle unless it is absolutely, positively necessary, precisely because to do so is to put their lives at risk.
The only people who truly do not support our troops are the ones who insist that they remain in Iraq, only to serve as human targets for an insurgency that has long since viewed them not as liberators, but occupiers.
It's not going to get any easier, Madame Speaker. If you can't stand the scrutiny, get the hell out of Washington. There are plenty of us out here who take our responsibility as citizens seriously, and who will never cease to demand answers, accountability and justice.
Unfiltered Video Commentary:
JOHN CONYERS IS STILL FAILING AMERICA.
DEMAND IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS NOW:
johnconyersjr@gmail.com / john.conyers@mail.house.gov
Phone:202-225-5126 Fax:202-225-0072
Dump Pelosi
There can be only one response to Pelosi's inability to think clearly about her responsibility to her job. This to DUMP HER! Support Cindy Sheehan. Pelosi's objectives are to stuff the congress with Democrats no matter what the cost to anything or anyone else.
AL K.
A Cindy Sheehan win in
A Cindy Sheehan win in November would certainly make for an.....entertaining two years in the 111th Congress.
Her attempt at the Rove...
..."say it often enough and loud enough and people will begin to believe it" doesn't seem to work for poor, #3, Nancy. If Cindy Sheehan doesn't beat her by a landslide, then there is no one to blame but the "Sheeple" wandering through their oblivious worlds. (Or, of course, the voting machines.)
Cindy doesn't have a
Cindy doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell of wining the general election. Even in San Francisco.
Cindy will win.
The only way Cindy won't win is if the election machines are rigged and there is no way to check them. They will be rigged. There has to be a paper trail. I am willing to go out from the far east to count for Cindy.
4Peace
If you come a little
If you come a little earlier, 4Peace, you can actually vote for her - we're pretty lax here in the Bay Area on voting.
Of course your vote will show up for Nancy (the machines) but then you can round up all the other couple dozen Cindy voters and start that 'Revolution' that is being talked about elsewhere in these threads.
:)
Huh. Is this a different
Huh. Is this a different Robert Wexler?
By the way,
I like the guy with the Kucinich shirt, he looks like Tommy Chong.
Time for a good old fashioned book-burning !
Anybody know how to get a PERMIT for a bonfire in the next town she hawks her flop?
IMPEACH BUSHCO & RICO PNAC/AIPAC...PNAC is Bush/Cheney's "Helter Skelter" !
WE MUST DEFEAT MCCAIN!!! "KNOW HER POMPOSITY" IS A FLOP!
Pelosi Confronted in California
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BCfrMQ0lw8
IMPEACH BUSHCO & RICO PNAC/AIPAC...PNAC is Bush/Cheney's "Helter Skelter" !
WE MUST DEFEAT MCCAIN!!!
DID I HIRE PELOSI TO PROMOTE A BOOK??
HEY!
IS OL' PELOSI FLYING AROUND IN A JET WE PAY FOR WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS--?
IS SHE USING THE GAS WE COULD SURE USE TO GET TO WORK?
IS SHE USING MONEY THAT SHOULD GO FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT--TO 'PROMOTE' HER RIDICULOUS 'BOOK'...
A BOOK THAT WILL SOON BE TOILET PAPER ON ALL AMERICAN TOILET PAPER ROLLERS?
WHY ISN'T SHE DOING THE JOB THAT I (AND OTHERS) HIRED HER TO DO IN 2006---WHEN SHE AND THE 'BLUE DOG' DEM'OCONS BELIEVED HER LIES:
QUIT FUNDING THE WAR;
IMPEACH BUSH;
HAVE A VOTE ON HR 676-HEALTHCARE FOR ALL;
PROSECUTE A FEW 'SPIES' WHO HAVE INFRINGED ON THE CONSTITUIONAL RIGHTS OF AMERICANS?
OH, I FORGOT--THAT'D LEAVE HER NO TIME TO SEE HER PLASTIC SURGEON!
BAH!
GET RID OF THAT OL' SLED; DUMP PELOSI AND VOTE IN A REAL HERO,
CINDY SHEEHAN!!
PETRA MACHAR
'WE ARE WATCHING'
CA-01 GROUP
MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA