Bush Has Photos of Pelosi

Nothing could compare to the obscene deaths and near deaths in Iraq when it comes to being totally EMBARRASSING--so ANYTHING they "have" on Pelosi is MILD!!!

While I was AWOL in Germany from the First Infantry Division in 1973, guess who came by my hiding place in Augsburg to buy some hashish? A lovely couple,that's who... one of the pair whom was also AWOL, and the other a young woman searching for answers in a crazy, war-torn world. You guessed it. It was George Bush and Nancy Pelosi. We all got stoned and had group sex, and at one point, George started taking photos with his new 35mm camera. First me and Nancy doing it...then George asked me if I'd click a few of "his turn", which I did, in a drugged out haze. Nancy on George, then Nancy firing up the pipe...George on Nancy...orgasmic bliss. I never did see the prints...and who would have figured that some day, in 2007, that those photos would save the now older George from facing justice...Good God, it's all my fault.I should have spoken out.I can prove we were both AWOL No impeachment because of me. Forgive me for my silence, world, I am so ashamed.

Two other possibilities are that Pelosi's family was threatened if she backed impeachment, or large donors to the Democratic Party threatened to cut funding to Democrats pursuing impeachment.

Maybe pictures of Pilosi at the Haliburtin colabotor picnic last summer, eating the heads off of shrimp gathered from New Orleans fish market just after hurricane katrina by Blackwater and set in the ICE that FEMA did not want to waist on survivors? But I'm just guessing.

support@informamerica.net A while back a guy in Ca. (don't remember his name was heading a coalition, etc. for impeachment and he even furnished a video clip at this site to explain the big money interest reasons why Pelosi couldn't cooperate on impeachment.
Unfortunately, however, when I viewed the clip it was basically just generalities stating that big money interest conflicts simply could not allow impeachment at all costs, including the big money interest which Pelosi has. So I never bothered researching all Pelosi's money interests because what good would it do? Even if you pointed out emphatically the conflict of interest factors it would not necessarily compel her to change her position. The fact is the special prosecutors are not responding to attacking the conflict of interest angles probably because so many politicians are investing in so many varied interests nowadays.
If you want to get down to bass tacks nitty grity here it is: many researchers and even conspiracy writers accept the concept that a favorite assassination tool of what they call the Bush Crime Family, aka, Bush-Clinton Crime Family, AKA Bush Crime Syndicate, etc., ad nauseum, use aircraft sabatoge as a means of eliminating opponents or extreme liability persons. I'm not joking about this.
You recall Pelosi asked for a larger, military type aircraft last year, didn't she?
I was informed it was Bill Clinton who drove Cokie Roberts's dad, Hale Boggs to the airfield the day he crashed. Long believed Clinton is part of the G.H.W.Bush leader of the pack gang. Also, I think after the October Surprise, John Tower, who probably had all the goods on Bush Sr. on this was killed in another aircrash in, I think, his private jet or turbo prop.

support@informamerica.netI just lost part two and starting over. Will deliver this in two parts to eliminate hackers.

In addition to all the abovementioned crashes, you may recall that John Kennedy Jr.'s aircrash was noteworthy not as an accident, but as a murder. There was a fourth person aboard that fateful aircraft who is believed to have been a flight instructor, but I don't think the FBI is officially admitting it as of yet. They still cover for G.H.W.Bush. There was reportedly bomb residue on the rear seat-luggage area and this has not been officially mentioned either. It is accepted by some that a barometric or barometer bomb was aboard and went off at a certain altitude similar to the Lockerbee Scotland crash.
It does not take much explosive to separate the empennage of a small plane from the main fuselage body of the aircraft and without the tail section, the empennage it cannot fly but straight down. You'll recall that the plane descended rapidly, and this is contrary to the alleged pilot error where pilots sometimes lose their "horizon" and cannot tell what the aircraft's attitude (nose up or nose down) is in bad weather by instrumentation alone. In such type of accident where pilot error is involved the descent rate is not necessarily nearly so steep and abrupt. I have logged a few hours in four place private planes and I can attest to this.
Also if you check the FSS,(flight service station) records for that area at the time of his crash you'll probably find reports which state the weather was not all that bad, which directly opposes the television reports of the weather at time of crash. JFK, Jr. was actually a pretty good pilot.
But he stood in Hillary's way of getting the N.York Senator spot and according to documents at tomflocco.com on the investigation ,"three U.S. Presidents were involved" in this murder.
After his death the copies of "True Colors", the Bush-Clinton Assassination teams documents were taken into custody and declared classified information. I think Madeline Albright, the Clintons, and I can't remember if the Smithsonian or some Archives has copy, etc.,etc., ad nauseum, but you can look it up,the same modus operandi of the JFK Assassination docs which were sealed. The favorite GOP method is to seal potentially damning evidence, declare it TOP SECRET, and thereby escape prosecution. I think they are sealed for a few decades. There's a link near top at right of my page, archive-1, just below the Libby article, etc.
In the case of Ron Brown's crash, the same thing that has happened in other flights with the manipulation of the radio beacon which guides the pilots on course is believed to have been used and flew the plane into a hillside in the rain. The radio guidance beacon works in rain or any weather as it is an electromagnetic radio beam. It's called flying "on the beam", etc.. Ron Brown was about to be required to testify on campaign fund fraud, or such, against Bill Clinton, and so his death is listed as another of the "Clinton Body Count". See my article at www.informamerica.net in archives on "Bloody Bill Clinton" link.
I could go on and on, and state one crash after the other, but what the hay. You folks can start looking some of this stuff up , too.
One thing you cannot say about me, I have never shied away from calling the current regime of current presidents and recent past presidents what they really are. They are in league in a grand CON, and massive coverup, and no doubt, Pelosi simply doesn't want to risk getting in their way. Other than black market nuclear triggers which allegedly are in place for a nuclear event on U.S. soil as a threat the CON holds over Pelosi's and America's head, I don't think she wants to go down in another airwreck.
YOU DON'T HAVE MUCH TIME AMERICA. YOU'D BETTER IMPEACH THESE BUMS NOW!!! Evidence indicates they are murderers. joemartin, www.informamerica.net

Well hallelujah! This has been my thought about Pelosi and impeachment all along. Mrs. Pelosi announced it was off the table TOO EARLY after winning. It was as if this decision was already in place in case the democrats won.
Also, this has been my thought as to why there is a Warrantless Surveillance Program. NOT to spy or listen in on OUR enemies, but THEIRS(cheney, bush, rumsfield and rove). Keep in mind, this is the repubs ace in the hole...spewing/collecting dirt on their opponents/enemies.
Also, keep in mind, the FBI had been abusing the NSL's and Gonzales knew about it and lied to Congress.
This entire administration has always been about more power and the "TOOLS" to get the job done. These "TOOLS" have allowed them to accumulate any minute thing on Democrats.e.g. Nelson of Nebraska caved in on not funding Cheneys' office. Why? Lieberman,once a DEMOCRATIC VP candidate sides with the Repubs.Why?(well, there is Israel)
I am not sure it is pictures...but I am sure they have something on all of them(dems and repubs) and use it (when the time is right)to keep them in line.
What Cheney and Bush should keep in mind after leaving office(bodyguards cannot relieve the fear that they have to live with)....Al Quaeda,the Taliban,Militias,Domestic terrorist will all still be out there...the memory goes through generations and their acts will NEVER be forgotten.

Hey David! This seems a little silly and I'm embarassed I took your bait, but fifteeen minutes of Google image searches and a photohouse session later produced the following...

Maybe it's the secret Pelosi-Madonna Kiss picture Smirky has!

CP ;>)

Earlier today I wrote down the following comments as I was wondering what the hell is Pelosi's problem. Here is what I wrote:

--"Nancy Pelosi is blocking impeachment. One could only theorize as to what her motives are in doing so. A thought came to mind, that if Bush is impeached then she will become the first woman President of the United States of America. Well, I think that is exactly the role that Hillary Clinton wants and has been working towards possibly all her life.
The Clintons being of great power – well maybe, just maybe that has something to do with Pelosi protecting both Bush and Cheney. She does not want to usurp Hillary’s ambitions.
Just a thought. I mean – with no real reasons why this woman, Pelosi is blocking impeachment one is left to speculate the reason why.--"

So maybe it's not Bush with the photos!

Is there any way we could recall Pelosi and have her removed from office soon?

David,

They have photos of Nancy trying on the brass ring; the brass ring with the inscription, “Unitary Executive” inscribed on the inside. The same brass ring the Bush cartel burnished in the fires of tyranny and cast in the foundry of perpetual war.

See, Nancy and the Democratic leaders do not want to extinguish the conflagration of expansive powers Bush has brazenly claimed and manufactured; they wantonly wish to possess them. This is, and always has been, a Faustian Bargain – our liberties and rights in exchange for supremacy and power in the hands of the elite and influential few.

-Frank J Ranelli

Two suits leaving Pelosi's secret "gentleman's bungalow", their hair all messed up. Caught by the first rays of the morning sun, the two could be positively identified: Ollie Getty and Marty Lockheed.

Cheers,

-Matty in Florida

What I wish they had photos of Pelosi doing, is something that would not be fit to print.

I know, I know! Bush has pictures of Nancy, Hillary, and Karl Rove working on Nixon's dirty tricks campaign.

In September 1989 a military junta siezed power in Burma. The leader of the democratic party, the National League for Democracy, was placed under house arrest. Nearly two decades later, she is there now.

In September 2001, a military-style coup took place in a different way, on a different continent. There are obvious differences between the two. For example, the second has infinitely more might, more resources, more weapons at their command. Where the first may threaten someone's family, the second can threaten wider groups of people, and can show that they mean what they say.

Please, respect Speaker Pelosi, while continuing to work towards restoring the democratic rule of law.

I don't think it's about photo's, I think it's what Nancy and every other Washington politician knows. They know the game is over. They know our government was overthrown. They know if they make it too hot for Cheney the mask will come off and we will see what they really are, irrelevant. They've been told, Impeachment means Martial Law.

I was thinking about this off and on through the night. At first I thought it must be SEX. But now I think it is about power. The power elite wants silence. They get silence.

Clinton wants to be president and perhaps has worked out a plan to achieve that. Why should she let the Constitution get in the way? Nancy has to stop this foolishness of protecting the Constitution. What a waste of time!

But what goods do they have on Conyers? That is the sad one. He seems like an honest and good person, unlike Nancy Pelosi.

Thanks for bringing up this subject concerning Pelosi, David Swanson!

In all seriousness, let's consider the fact that Bush may have been spying on ALL of Congress, using the NSA, since 2001. Bush has already admitted that spying on millions of ordinary Americans has been occurring for years. Furthermore, the U.S. bugged the U.N. missions of numerous countries during the run-up to the Iraq war in order to determine which nations were with us and which were agin' us while U.N. votes on the Iraq situation were occurring.

So does it take a great stretch of the imagination to consider that one of the FIRST targets of wholesale NSA spying would be the Congress - where reside the votes to overturn all of our cherished civil liberties and to vote for endless war?

Having dirt and threatening, in whatever way appropriate to each Congress member, would explain the lock-step, sig-heil marching of the Republicans prior to November 2006. It would explain the continued spinelessness of the Dems SINCE November, 2006. It would explain John Conyers suddenly backing down on impeachment and would explain Pelosi's putting it and keeping it off the table.

Folks, we're not talking about "normal" political dirty tricks,here, i.e., the politics-as-usual stuff that goes on ad nauseum every election cycle and between election cycles (ALL the time) between two contesting parties.

We're talking about a hijacking of the U.S. government using spying as a means of control and creating a state of fear in the Congress - a deadly game that rises to another greater evil level.

The NeoCons are a dangerous breed who have proven time and again the lengths to which they will go to get their way.

Is is totally implausible that they would get dirt on Repubs and Dems alike as they ascended to power in 2001, in order to STAY in power? There is great fear in Congress. I submit many politicians there have been quietly informed they will be outed, their families harmed, not to take plane rides, photos will be released, audio/video tapes will be released...whatever it takes...to get their continued "cooperation" for the NeoCon line.

Yeah sounds like a bad dark political novel. But this administration is totally ruthless. We're not in Kansas anymore.

We need to start asking in a very wide and public way this question of whether Congress is being threatened and spied upon. Our nation and Constitution, the survival of planet Earth as we know it, are all at stake.

Though doing it partly in jest, David Swanson has really touched upon something plausible and powerful here.

Bloggers: please raise this speculation and maybe find hard evidence? It would explain a LOT of congressional actions!

Gotta be Pelosi doing a Lewinski on Bush, Cheney, or Scooter Libby.

But just wait until after the '08 election when the new Democratic President issues blanket pardons to everyone in the Bush administration. That's the precedent the Democrats intend to uphold and the only reason they'd be allowed to occupy the White House.

I watched this play out before, with Iran-Contra, and I'm pretty darned tired of seeing history repeat.

This article was referenced on Common Sense Political Thought.

The last thing that these fantasy impeachments would do is actually change policy! There’s no provision in the Constitution for a joint impeachment of both the President and Vice President, which means they must be done separately. Regardless of in what order they were done, the President (whether George Bush or Dick Cheney) would get to appoint a new Vice President. Even if we assumed, as Mr Swanson does, that they could get 16 Senate Republicans to go along with removal, there is no way they’d get them to go along with such a removal if the Democrats refused to confirm a new vice presidential appointment.

Regardless of how they did it, there would be a Republican president in the White House until January 20, 2009. And if the Democrats do something so stupid, they might just reunify the GOP enough that there would be a Republican president in the White House until January 20, 2013!

Some of our friends in the “reality-based community” sure lack much connection with reality. They’d rather have a meaningless political victory than actually change our country’s policies.

The reason Pelosi is stubbornly clinging to insanity ("Impeachment is off the table") has been clearly defined in literature, press releases, and public webcasts by Lyndon LaRouche-her husband owns a hedge fund, and is business parterns with evil, dirty people like Felix Rohatyn-who don't want Cheney out, and don't want an "FDR reflex" in the Democratic Party. It's that simple. Now, if Hillary is really smart, she will take LaRouche's advice, and use her position as a powerful Democratic candidate and leader, and the wife of the Oh-So-Popular Bill Clinton, to get Cheney OUT, by calling for his immediate impeachment!

What could be more embarrassing than the pictures we have seen of Pelosi, acting as a coward, refusing to stand up against this evil administration. She should be ashamed of herself. This makes here a prostitute who is complicit in treason. Haven't people been thrown in prison for less?

As much as I wish it were as simple as some dirt on Pelosi (doubtless not a stretch of the imagination), or the Bush zio-nazi crime family (a la Prescott the Nazi financier) threatening her or her family (also not a stretch by any means), I fear it's something more obtuse, more muddled in the usual flaccid facade of a self-serving, cowardly oligarchy.

The hegelian dialectic is the true religion of these monsters slouching toward Bethlehem. Both sides playing against the middle so to speak. I offer this as perfect proof:

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/11/levin-lieberman-love-fest-one-step...

ZERO Naysayers?!?! Not our stalwart Obama or Hillary? Not anyone stood up for the America that we have idle fantasies so often of being a legitimate democracy? Not one? Sorry ...nope. We have no one in "places of power" on the people's side. Zilch. Zip. Nada. They don't care if we live or die just so long as they keep the money - and hence, the power.

And why would I say such a thing?

Once again, to have dirty photos on all members of the senate or to threaten the longevity or welfare of every senator and their loved ones is a tall order - even for a pack of murderous thugs like the Bush crime lords. So what would it be? Why is Iran so frigging important (or why was Iraq)?

Well, after all my long-windedness (and I'm really begging you not to moderate this reply to death- I'll try to be entertaining) I'm sure you're expecting the perennial answer, right? Oil, oil and more oil. Our oil under their sand.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong!

Why did they go after Saddam when it was obvious he had nothing to do with 9-11? The rest of the world knew this. Why didn't the American people? "They" ("they" being the ubiquitous central bank elite. Pick whichever Illuminati image of western intrigue that might suit you.) didn't want you to know above all others. And besides, you've been paying their way for centuries- or at least since the rise of the nineteenth century industrial magnates.

Back to Iraq.

Saddam was important because he broke the first almighty law of ALL petroleum bourses. NEVER, I repeat NEVER sell your nation's oil (no matter how much oil you might have) in any currency other than the petro-dollar (a.k.a. the FIAT US dollar) or face the consequences. (Sorta makes that "Mission Accomplished" sign hanging behind Chimpy on that destroyer in the first months of the war more sensible don't you think? Rather Straussian IMHO.) The consequences? ...invasion and a lightening-speed reversal back to... ta, da, da, da, ...the US dollar.

Now this year, Iran has created its own oil bourse and has made it clear that any currency OTHER THAN the, now floundering, US dollar would be greatly appreciated from now on as payment in full. (Ask the Japanese if the Iranian oil they just purchased was paid for from the 1.2 trillion US dollar surplus they have or their own "carry trade" special - the yen. Really, go check ...I'll wait.)

*whistles*

See, just this week Iran notified them of this change in payment plans. This doesn't sit well with an oilgarchy (yea, I know it's misspelled- sue me.) Not with the Fed that prints this "funny money" and certainly not with the BIS (the bank of international settlements- otherwise known as the central banker's bank).

So back to Pelosi... It's not about some filthy tryst or homoerotic fantasy that we might conjure up for the occasion. It's not about some threat of anthrax or "murder most foul" in the darkest of night. It's not even about the oil in Iraq- although there are plenty of obvious "financial perks" to be had during this genocidal surge (see: Halliburton, Blackwater, The Carlyle Group, The forced rise of crude pricing, yada, yada, yada...).

It's about what it's always been about (or at least since 1913, then 1933 and finally 1972- do some of your own work and go look up what these dates have to do with the Federal Reserve.), protecting our very global, primary reserve, fiat US$. Ka-ching!!!

So sure, Pelosi doesn't want ANOTHER scandal around monkey-boy (Bush) and his hurdy-gurdy man (Cheney). Big deal really. But much more importantly she (and apparently the entire US senate) have no interest in allowing a popularity to rise in the Euro (or any other currency for that matter) until our honorably sleazy US leaders are firmly out of our dear, debased dollar and well entrenched in the next chosen measurement of wealth- and by that I mean power (e.g. The Euro, Gold, SILVER, the Canadian or Australian dollars [both commodity-based currencies for intents and purposes], etc. - choose wisely as it may be a matter of life and death in the near future.)

If you smell something awful (perhaps the scent of a rotting corpse?) just reach around to your back pocket. Yep, it's coming from your wallet. You may not be aware of it yet but the US dollar is dead/dying. It's got a fork stuck in it - it's done. It just rolled under 81 basis points this last week ans is plunging fast.

Many nations have been quickly and quietly diversifying out of this dead horse and since it hasn't been backed with anything but happy, happy thoughts, Lockheed Martin, Numerous underbelly cartels and a US military oozing across the globe it goes inevitably where every fiat currency has ever gone- to toilet paper. Funny we never hear any of this from the "news", no? Very sneaky sis...

No gold backing means endless war. Now with endless wars not even keeping the nations "in line" with the greenback, the great, illustrious, superpower, empire (now with flavor crystals and whitening!) called the United States is about to get the bill. Which is sad when you consider that the country is so deeply in debt, so broke it can't even pay attention (sorry) ...but I digress again.

Pelosi is just your average, run-o'-the-mill parasitic, elitist coward. Nutin' special. Just like the rest of the senate and congress and executive branch and blah, blah, blah in-charge. No romance to this at all. She and the rest of her ilk simply don't want to wake up one morning and find their bank account full of millions of squares of toilet paper. And whatever she chooses to do at that tear-stained, tantrum-shaking moment I'm sure I DON'T WANT any secret photos of.

Bush has sure mussed thins up sumpin' fierce eh compadres??

Adios,

Form

PS: You mention that "it is war time after all". My question to you sir is "In the U.S.A. when is it NOT 'war time'?" Hmmm?

It's a video with sound. Hillary is telling Pelosi, "You better not impeach Bush/Cheney. I, Hillary Clinton, want to be the first woman president." "Yes, madam President," says Pelosi.

It could be that she's just a miserable weasel. Afterall, she is a politician.

Many, many Minnesotans believe that Paul Wellstone's death in Oct. 2002 just before the election --and after he voted AGAINST authorizing the Iraq war--was NOT an accident... (no real cause was found, a vague statement of "pilot error" emerged). Recall that he was ahead of Norm Coleman in the polls when he was killed. Note also that his wife and daughter also died in the plane crash. Look at the spinelessness of the Democratic Senate that followed--for the short time they held the majority subsequently. If the crash was not an accident, perhaps the message was, "Cross us and not only you pay, but your family does, too."
And to voice the opinion that it was not an accident is to immediately be marginalized as a nut case (but not necessarily in MN...) But, look at what else has been going on in this country in plain sight, and then consider whether that's such a loony scenario after all... what better example of an enforceable threat that might explain all sorts of spineless congressional/senate behavior...

This makes sense. Why else are the DEMS so spinless --- unless --- they KNOW that the Bush/Chaney cabal has no intention of leaving power in 08, and they are making sure they protect their future jobs and economic positions. If they were told they would lose everything once the power has completely been usurped by the dictatorship, or worse, their lives and their families lives and fortunes threatened, well, that would explain it. Of course, it wouldn't explain the lack of true brave warrior-patriots running our country. If this is the case, we know the result. We are finished as a nation. Who in Europe will come and rescue America from dictatorhsip?