Afghanistan
How to End Wars
Submitted by davidswanson on Sat, 2009-11-07 13:20.By David Swanson
Around the United States, peace groups are engaged in effective campaigns against proposed new military installations, local funding of weapons companies, and the routine destruction of the environment and of workers' health by such companies. Activists are building better media outlets, educating young people, educating old people, keeping military testing and recruiting out of schools, and discouraging the Army from building real-weapon video arcades in shopping malls. But when it comes to stopping our wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, our citizens are less clear how to go about it.
UN Pulls Out Half Its Afghanistan Staff and Threatens Total Withdrawal
Submitted by Chip on Fri, 2009-11-06 23:05.UN pulls out half its Afghanistan staff and threatens total withdrawal | Times On Line
The United Nations today temporarily pulled half its international staff out of Afghanistan and threatened that a complete and permanent withdrawal could follow.
Amid an atmosphere of increasing gloom in Afghanistan, the UN Special Representative in Kabul, Kai Eide delivered a pointed warning to the government of Hamid Karzai.
“There is a belief among some, that the international community (presence) will continue whatever happens because of the strategic importance of Afghanistan,” he told a press conference this morning. “I would like to emphasise that that’s not true.”
He added that the Afghan government must demonstrate a willingness to reform and address corruption and the power of warlords. Read more
They Want $50 Billion More for War - Do We Want to Stop Them?
Submitted by davidswanson on Fri, 2009-11-06 12:02.The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mike Mullen, says another supplemental spending vote for war money in the next few months will be in the range of $50 billion.
Will we be prepared to stop it?
Daniel Ellsberg: Don't Repeat Vietnam in Afghanistan Pt.1
Submitted by Chip on Fri, 2009-11-06 05:39.DOJ Releases Special Report on Detainee Treatment at Gitmo, Iraq, Afghanistan
Submitted by Chip on Thu, 2009-11-05 15:27.Grab a beverage of your choice - it's 441 pages long.
2010 Looms: Democrats Crash and Burn in Virginia and New Jersey
Submitted by dlindorff on Wed, 2009-11-04 15:56.By Dave Lindorff
It would be easy to read too much into the few statewide races that were decided last night, but I think it’s fair to say that the results in New Jersey and Virginia, where Republican gubernatorial candidates won--in New Jersey’s case knocking off a well-funded Democratic incumbent--that the results were a blow to the Barack Obama/Rahm Emanuel strategy of playing to the right, of avoiding confrontation in Congress and of ignoring the progressive voters whose enthusiasm and effort back in the 2008 campaign put Obama in office.
Heeding George Kennan's Wise Advice
Submitted by Chip on Tue, 2009-11-03 22:25.
Heeding George Kennan's Wise Advice
By Ray McGovern | November 3, 2009
I can’t remember how many times I have said that the U.S. military adventure in Afghanistan is a fool’s errand.
The reaction I frequently encounter includes some variant of, “How can you blithely acquiesce in the chaos that will inevitably ensue if we and our NATO allies withdraw our troops?” While the “inevitable chaos” part is open to doubt, the question itself is a fair one.
By way of full disclosure, my answer is based largely on the fact that I asked the equivalent question 43 years ago regarding a place named Vietnam. Been there; done that.
As a young Army infantry/intelligence officer turned junior CIA analyst in 1963, I was given responsibility for reporting on Soviet policy toward China and Southeast Asia and was just beginning to get a feel for the complexities. My degrees were in Russian studies; I knew something about Communist expansion, but very little about Vietnam.
I should have listened to my brother Joe at Princeton, who tried to help me see that it was mainly a civil war in Vietnam, that the Vietnamese had ample reason to hate both the Russians and Chinese (and now us), and that the “domino effect” was a canard.
Joe was openly impatient to find me such a slow learner — so susceptible to the Red-menace fear mongering of the time.
Enter George Kennan
Where Were the Anti-War Demonstrators?
Submitted by davidswanson on Tue, 2009-11-03 01:10.By Tom Gallagher, CommonDreams.org
A couple of weekends ago, there was a demonstration against the ongoing wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan in San Francisco. The San Francisco Chronicle put the crowd at 1,000. I might have said something more - not over 2,000, though - and certainly wouldn't argue with the paper's headline: "S.F. anti-war march smaller than some hoped for."
It reported that "by 2 p.m., the crowd had dwindled to just a few dozen ... when peace activist Daniel Ellsberg, the former military analyst who released the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War, took his turn at the microphone" (a claim whose veracity I cannot judge as, I too had left for another commitment by that point.) Since more people had turned out to hear Noam Chomsky at a couple of Bay Area appearances the prior weekend than came to the demonstration, the problem obviously wasn't lack of interest in the issues it raised. But as a quoted demonstrator said, "It should be 10-fold" and that probably was about the size it would have had to be to make people feel really good about it.
I decided I'd ask - mostly via email - a group of people, whose likelihood of attending the average antiwar march seemed to range from possible to probable, to "give me some idea of what your reasons were for not coming." The responses will not be confused with a scientific sampling, to be sure, but I was struck by the breadth of the reasons cited as well as by a certain eagerness in putting them forward. People seemed to want to talk about why they weren't there. This appeared to be a question they were asking themselves.
There were, of course, the routine everyday reasons: People didn't hear about it, or at least not soon enough. Some had to be at the kid's soccer game or they were in Portland, Oregon, and the like. Certainly the lack of reach of the publicity on this one did seem particularly pronounced. San Francisco Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, who came to the rally and ultimately spoke at it, told me he'd only heard about it two days earlier through an email reminder I'd sent out. One organizer of the event noted that the two public radio stations most likely to give it advance notice didn't and/or couldn't. (Pacifica station KPFA had been in the midst of an extended on-air fund-raising drive - times are tough there too.)
Country Joe, Kenny Rogers and Obama
Submitted by dlindorff on Mon, 2009-11-02 16:24.By Dave Lindorff
Country Joe McDonald said it best in his iconic "Fixin' to Die" Rag: "Oh, it's one, two, three, what are we fightin' for? Don't ask me. I don't give a damn." In fact, we were fighting for nothing in Vietnam. It was a war that started out because the US didn't want the Commies to win a battle in the so-called Cold War, and even though it was on the farthest side of the world, in a poor nation of peasants, even though they had been struggling to throw off colonialism for years and we had simply become the new colonists, no president dared to admit the obvious--we had no business being there, and all the killing and dying had no point.
Too Big to Fail?
Submitted by davidswanson on Sun, 2009-11-01 22:37.Why All the President's Afghan Options Are Bad Ones
By Tom Engelhard,
In the worst of times, my father always used to say, "A good gambler cuts his losses." It's a formulation imprinted on my brain forever. That no-nonsense piece of advice still seems reasonable to me, but it doesn't apply to American war policy. Our leaders evidently never saw a war to which the word "more" didn't apply. Hence the Afghan War, where impending disaster is just an invitation to fuel the flames of an already roaring fire.
Bill Moyers Essay: Restoring Accountability for Washington's Wars
Submitted by davidswanson on Sun, 2009-11-01 14:21.Taliban leader rejects U.S. attempts to lure away fighters with money
Submitted by davidswanson on Sat, 2009-10-31 01:17.By CNN
Kabul, Afghanistan (CNN) -- A top Taliban political leader delivered a message Friday to President Obama, calling his attempt to lure away Taliban fighters with money "an old weapon that has failed already."
"The Mujahedeen of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan are not mercenaries and employed gunmen like the armed men of the invaders and their surrogates," Mullah Brader Akhund said in the statement. "This war will come to an end when all invaders leave our country and an Islamic government based on the aspirations of our people is formed in the country."
Akhund is the deputy emir of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, which is the political arm of the Taliban.
He was referring to the Taliban reintegration provision, part of the $680 billion defense appropriation bill that Obama signed Wednesday to pay for military operations in the 2010 fiscal year.
Kipling Haunts Obama's Afghan War
Submitted by davidswanson on Fri, 2009-10-30 16:45.By Ray McGovern, http://www.consortiumnews.com
The White Man’s Burden, a phrase immortalized by English poet Rudyard Kipling as an excuse for European-American imperialism, was front and center Thursday morning at a RAND-sponsored discussion of Afghanistan in the Russell Senate Office Building.
The agenda was top-heavy with RAND speakers, and the thinking was decidedly “inside the box” — so much so, that I found myself repeating a verse from Kipling, who also recognized the dangers of imperialism, to remind me of the real world:
It is not wise for the Christian white
To hustle the Asian brown;
For the Christian riles
And the Asian smiles
And weareth the Christian down.
At the end of the fight
Lies a tombstone white
With the name of the late deceased;
And the epitaph drear,
A fool lies here,
Who tried to hustle the East.
Ex-State Department Official Explains Exit Over Afghan War Strategy
Submitted by davidswanson on Fri, 2009-10-30 16:20.In an interview with Judy Woodruff, Matthew Hoh, the first U.S. official known to resign in protest to America's presence in Afghanistan, discusses his objections to the war.
JIM LEHRER: Next tonight, we continue our ongoing conversations on Afghanistan.
Tonight, it's with an official dissenter to U.S. policy.
Judy Woodruff is in charge.
JUDY WOODRUFF: After five months serving with the State Department in Afghanistan, Matthew Hoh became the first U.S. official known to resign in protest against American policies there.
In his September 10 letter of resignation, revealed this week in "The Washington Post," the former Marine captain said: "I fail to see the value or worth in continued U.S. casualties or expenditure of resources in support of the Afghan government in what is, truly, a 35-year-old civil war."




















www.VelvetRevolution.us
Recent comments
10 hours 17 min ago
21 hours 25 min ago
3 days 15 hours ago
3 days 17 hours ago
3 days 21 hours ago
4 days 16 hours ago
4 days 20 hours ago
4 days 22 hours ago
5 days 10 hours ago
6 days 2 min ago